MINNEAPOLIS — After George Floyd's murder last summer, protests erupted in Minneapolis and across the country. In some cases, police deployed tear gas as a crowd control measure.
Witnessing that use of tear gas inspired Carlee Toddes, Jennifer Brown, and some fellow Ph.D. students at the University of Minnesota Medical School to begin researching.
"We started researching out of our own curiosity to find out what the long-term health effects [of tear gas] might be," said Brown. "And as we were looking into it further and further, we realized there just isn't enough research on those long-term health effects."
The group read hundreds of pieces of literature before writing a paper on their findings, which was published in late March in the Journal of Science Policy & Governance. The paper says there are very few human studies on the long-term effects of tear gas and "those that exist are highly constrained."
"Most of the studies we found stop monitoring people after about 24 hours," Brown said.
They aren't the only people in the medical field speaking out. Last weekend a separate group from the University of Minnesota marched to the Brooklyn Center Police Department. Many were involved in a study that showed 89 people were severely injured by tear gas and rubber bullets during the protests last summer.
"We need to reconsider its use on civilians when we, as the scientific community, don't have data on the long-term health effects of exposing people to these chemicals," said Brown.
So what should police use instead of tear gas? The paper suggests using de-escalation tactics before any sort of force. It points to the Seattle Police Department's new de-escalation policy as a template for other departments to use.